Retrospective Entry to the Flat-Rate Scheme

Retrospective Entry to the Flat-Rate Scheme

Julian Anthony Goodman appealed to the First-Tier Tribunal regarding HMRC's decision to refuse retrospective entry to the VAT Flat-Rate Scheme for small businesses. Mr. Goodman provided consultancy services in a self-employed capacity from 1 July 2012 to 28 February 2014 and was registered for VAT from the 1 July 2012 however he did not apply for the Flat-Rate Scheme until May 2014, after he had ceased trading and once he became aware of the scheme.

Mr. Goodman requested that his entrance to the scheme be backdated to the date on which he began trading however HMRC only authorised him to make use of the scheme from 1 March 2014.On appealing this decision, it was agreed that Mr. Goodman satisfied the necessary criteria for admission to the Flat-Rate Scheme from 1 July 2012 but rejected his argument that he had overpaid VAT (as the correct amount had been paid under the standard VAT rules) and thus there was no duty on HMRC to permit retrospective admission, particularly as there were no exceptional circumstances in this case.

The Appeal was therefore dismissed and retrospective entry to the Flat-Rate Scheme was disallowed. Please call our free helpline to discover if you are eligible for admission on to an existing special scheme, such as the Flat-Rate Scheme, available to VAT registered businesses.

Related posts

Place of supply of services

A case was recently heard by the Upper Tribunal relating to the place of supply of services made by the Appellant, Mandarin Consulting Ltd, who provided career coaching to students of Chinese origin.

D.I.Y Builders Scheme

Mr Smith, the Appellant in this instance, converted a barn adjoining his property into living accommodation for which planning permission was obtained. In 2007, when 60% of the work had been completed, Mr Smith became aware that he may be able to recover the VAT element of the costs incurred in the course of converting the barn by way of the DIY builder's scheme and a claim was subsequently submitted.

Input Tax Recovery - Intending Trader

The VAT recovery position of intending traders has formed the basis of several court decisions in recent times, and this was again addressed in the case of Hedge Fund Investment Management Ltd (“HFIML”), heard by the First-Tier Tribunal. HMRC had raised an assessment in relation to input tax recovered by the business, on the basis that there was no link to any taxable economic activity. Furthermore, a penalty assessment was raised in relation to the recovery of this input tax for careless behaviour.